Archive for the ‘Opinions’ Category

Botak Jones did it again

main_banner01

I was invited to Botak Jones‘ new lunch set menu food tasting session last Saturday (12 Dec 09). Didn’t know what to expect, so I went with an open mind. And boy, I was pleased, which inspired this post.

How does a Western food outlet situated at coffee shops get so much buzz when all other similar ones just wither away? The answer is easy when you know how Botak Jones does it. (more…)

Does The Rise of Social Media Let Everyone Become a PR Agent?

picture ource: http://hinchcliffe.org/

This issue was brought up by my friend recently and I thought it is a good topic to discuss about. So does the rise of social media let everyone become their own PR agent? My opinion is that no, it doesn’t.

I believe public relations is more than just pitching to journalists. It consists also of event organization, issue management, media training, strategic planning and internal communication. For KinetiqBuzz, we have broaden it further to include relationship building, community building, online issues management, personal branding and more.

(more…)

The worst MRT ad for 2009…

DSC004372-300x225

Someone at IAS Portfolio must be drunk when they approved this advertisement that can be seen in most MRT stations in Singapore.

When I first laid eyes on it, I thought, Nice layout, but for a book or flyer not for a billboard. You don’t have to be a marketing genius to know that hardly anyone will be so captivated by the artwork that he will stop read all the words plunked into one big paragraph and then smile and continue on his way into/out of the MRT station.

Seriously! (more…)

Local Cafe found to be myopic

LOGO

In an age where cafes are trying very hard to build customer loyalty and get people to hang out at their outlets, one little cafe chain seems thinks that it is not really worth it.

Roderick, my colleague and I, met at Cafe Galilee @ Bedok Library yesterday for a discussion. We each bought drinks and sat down at a table. The discussion went on for about 2 hours plus. Then came along a staff and told us that we can’t sit for too long without ordering more food. Not to say that the drinks are really cheap coffee shop prices. I would understand it if there are limited space and we are actually preventing more customers from patronizing the cafe. But I looked around only to find many more empty tables (!).

(more…)

Reputation comes cheap at True Yoga

Something must be awfully wrong in the True Group boardroom. Despite getting bad press last month for not relenting to a court ordered refund of (just) $2,500 on Jan 24, they were still strong headed and kept on at being bad!

On Feb 13, the local newspapers reported on how customers are complaining about poor service at the fitness centre. Straits Times, in its article, noted that

  • Online, the forums and blogs are abuzz with gripes against the yoga arm, with customers venting their frustrations in at least 50 postings.
  • A group of 16 disgruntled customers have also banded together to file a collective suit against True Spa.
  • customers have so far been angry about repeated cancellation of appointments made for spa treatments, pressure selling and the unavailability of slots despite bookings being made five weeks ahead.  

In response, their spokesperson said “……., we have offered them ways to make bookings easier. There is really nothing else we can do”.

Are you kidding me? Nothing else you can do?? There is something they obviously can do. Refund the customer.

First off, they need to decide which is more important, money or customer satisfaction? I would suggest to the GM that put customer satisfaction before money. A satisfied customer can be a customer for life. An unhappy customer is going to make a hell lot of noise. The management at True Yoga must have been living in a well. Don’t they know that with Social Media, anyone can spread a piece bad news like a bush fire.

Customers can band together either for your company or against your company. I hope the Management wasn’t surprised to find “a group of 16 disgruntled customers have also banded together to file a collective suit against True Spa” (ST). I bet these 16 people didn’t even know each other before this. And now they have a common enemy. Dangerous.

Why bother spending so much money in glossy ads, spokesperson and promos to build credibility and then let is all go down the drain because of greed. I guess reputation comes cheap at True Yoga. Definitely cheaper than their spa packages.

What we can learn from this:

1. Your reputation is more valuable than the cost of any product or services that you offer. 

2. If your customer is not happy, help resolve the issue sincerely. If you cannot resolve it, then give full refund. The sensible customer will understand and forgive you for your mistake. The irrational customer will not dare make news about it, because they know inside them that they are being irrational.

3. If your customer has to use legal means to resolve the issue, its as good as losing him/her for good. As reported: “Marketing manager Nora Yusoff, 43, took True Spa to court last year, where an agreement was made that allowed her to make bookings a week in advance. She said: ‘It improved for me after that, and I was able to use my whole package. But I am never going to sign up with True Spa again.’”

4. Remember what Warren Buffet said. It takes years to build a reputation and a day to destroy it. (or something like that). 

 

Full article as appeared on ST below:

Feb 13, 2009

Wellness group gets flak from customers

Complaints pile up online and at Case; unhappy spa clients file collective suit

By Jessica Lim

 

 

 

COMPLAINTS about poor service are piling up against the True Group, the wellness empire that runs yoga, fitness and spa businesses here.

The Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) received 331 last year, more than double the 155 filed in 2007. And barely two months into this year, True’s business arms have already drawn 15 complaints, mostly against True Yoga.

Online, the forums and blogs are abuzz with gripes against the yoga arm, with customers venting their frustrations in at least 50 postings. A group of 16 disgruntled customers have also banded together to file a collective suit against True Spa.

Last month, True made the news when a court bailiff went to its True Fitness outlet in Suntec City to seize equipment to raise money to make good on a customer’s court-ordered refund of $2,500.

True’s customers have so far been angry about repeated cancellation of appointments made for spa treatments, pressure selling and the unavailability of slots despite bookings being made five weeks ahead.

Assistant marketing manager Tan Siang Mei, who bought a $4,000 spa package in 2006, said she has hardly been able to get through the booking hotline and has had appointments cancelled at the last minute. As a result, the 29-year-old has used only $580 worth of services in two years.

Of her attempts to make spa appointments, she said: ‘No one picks up the phone. And when you are lucky enough to get some attention, spots are fully booked for weeks on end.’

Going online in the middle of last year, she had no difficulty finding 80 others with bad experiences at True Spa. Out of that number, 15 of them joined her to file the collective suit.

One member of the group, a 27-year-old teacher who declined to be named, wants a refund for the $6,000 package she bought. She is frustrated in having snagged appointments for only three sessions in her eight months as a member.

A True Spa spokesman confirmed that the spa received a writ of summons through the group’s lawyer on Jan 24, but said True has ruled out refunds.

‘In these cases, we have offered them ways to make bookings easier. There is really nothing else we can do,’ he said.

He explained that the existing system allowed customers to book spa slots two weeks in advance for peak hours and a day or two ahead for off-peak times; some of those who complained were assigned personal representatives to help them with bookings. He said these customers had earlier sought refunds for entirely different reasons, such as financial difficulty or because their favourite massage treatments were no longer offered.

But one of two lawyers representing the complainants, Mr Michael Loh of Clifford Law, said: ‘It’s not a case of wanting their money back due to making a bad decision. They are coming forward with what they have experienced, which should not be discounted in any way.’

He said his clients were asking for a full refund, though they were open to ‘any sincere offer’ to settle the matter.

Case, which has described the number of complaints as ‘quite high’, advises consumers to be clear about the terms and conditions of membership and to go online for reviews before signing up.

It added that, it may, if needed, invite True to sign a Voluntary Compliance Agreement, that is, admit to unfair trading practices, compensate its customers and clean up its act.

Mr Peter Sng from the Spa Association of Singapore put down True’s problems to its membership base being too large.

Marketing manager Nora Yusoff, 43, took True Spa to court last year, where an agreement was made that allowed her to make bookings a week in advance.

She said: ‘It improved for me after that, and I was able to use my whole package. But I am never going to sign up with True Spa again.’

…..end…….

 

The persuasive power of “Low-Fat” Nutrition labels! It can make you fat

I came across this an extract from Journal of Marketing Research website that caught my attention. It just validates what we have suspected all along. Eating ‘low-fat’ labeled food product can actually make you fat! This is something food retailers might want to know: 

 

In this era of increasing obesity and increasing threats of legislation and regulation of food marketing practices, regulatory agencies have pointedly asked how “low-fat” nutrition claims may influence food consumption. The authors develop and test a framework that contends that low-fat nutrition labels increase food intake by (1) increasing perceptions of the appropriate serving size and (2) decreasing consumption guilt. Three studies show that low-fat labels lead all consumers—particularly those who are overweight—to overeat snack foods. Furthermore, salient objective serving-size information (e.g., “Contains 2 Servings”) reduces overeating among guilt-prone, normal-weight consumers but not among overweight consumers. With consumer welfare and corporate profitability in mind, the authors suggest win–win packaging and labeling insights for public policy officials and food marketers

Source

 

Bad acting spotted at lightboxes around town

 

The supposedly very real public notice

Oh dear there they go again. Some big shot creative persons in the ad industry comes up with an idea so ‘guerilla’. 

 

Apparently the latest ads of the upcoming programmes on FX Channel put up in bus stop lightboxes have been slapped with notice stickers issued by Department of Appropriate Behaviour… *roll eyes*

The programmes have violated some Decency Act that dangers the moral fabric our Singaporean society. (really?)

I get it, they are trying to create some kind of buzz marketing/guerilla marketing tactic. But really, when it is too polished, when it is too obvious, who’s paying attention. Not me. Just too much words on the notice for me to be bothered.

They have also taken full-page ad with the same public notices on the local papers like Today and Straits Times….oh dear, have they been too creative to realise that in Singapore, if a message is detrimental to society, the authorities will not even let it to print, much less have a public notice pasted on the ads!

The marketing director of NGC Network Asia (which owns the FX Channel) released a statement to Marketing Magazine: ”Having been notified that the public has been warned not to watch the channels comes as a surprise. This is a compliment I suppose as it proves that our campaign has worked so well to promote the edgy and provocative content in the channel, that people are stepping in to tell the public what they should or should not watch.”

My verdict: Bad acting all around.

But then again, the ad agency responsible will probably win an award for this. Who knows…


Should Religion Market Its Image?

As reported in Straits Times, (22/07/08) “All 69 mosques have joined hands for an event that community leaders hope will come to signify what the Muslim community stands for.”

It was nice to know that after the trashing Islam took worldwide since the 911 incident the Muslim community in Singapore is slowly and steadily making a concerted PR effort to separate itself from radicalism and senseless violence.

Blessing To All Day, as it is called, will be an annual event that includes a blood donation drive and sharing of food to with the needy of different religious background…to signify what the Muslim community stands for”. It is a way of showing the community that they are indeed “walking the talk and show its positive attributes”. Well said! Yes, we all can take a leaf from their book here.

But must religion wait for a reputation crisis before it starts thinking of managing its perception? Never mind that Singapore is a peaceful country with laws that maintains religious harmony. Shouldn’t all religion put aside time, money and energy to build (or at least maintain) its positive image?

I say, Yes!  And not just to people within its faith but to community at large. Here’s why:

1. The believers need less convincing that the people of the other faith. As much as religion makes an effort to imbibe the faith in its followers, it needs to tell the others what it is all about and what is it’s stand on issues affecting it’s image. This should not be confused with a zealous attempt at converting non-believers. Rather, it is about building a positive image like what “Blessing To All” Project is about.

2. People are just too distracted nowadays. If an organisation don’t tell its publics what it stand for, people wouldn’t bother finding out. You are really leaving it up to situations and prejudices of the masses to make their own conclusion.

3. The one big purpose of PR applies to all organisations, institutions and individuals: You need to build a reservoir of goodwill from which to draw from during bad times. 

What’s your take?

Do you think religion should have a PR plan as part of their operation and actually market their image to people outside their faith? What are the pros and cons of doing this?